Editorial Guidelines
The framework that ensures our content remains neutral, analytical, and professional.
Our Guiding Philosophy
All content produced for The Industrial Architects must adhere to a strict set of guidelines designed to uphold our core mission of providing neutral, historically grounded analysis. These principles are non-negotiable and apply to all formats, including articles, interviews, and case studies.
Style and Tone
The required style is neutral, informative, professional, journalistic, analytical, and structured.
- Narration: All articles must be written strictly in the third person. The use of "I," "we," or "you" is forbidden outside of direct quotations from sources.
- Objectivity: Content must present facts and evidence without emotional language or authorial bias. Avoid adverbs and adjectives that imply judgment (e.g., "unfortunately," "remarkably," "brilliantly").
- Clarity: Writing should be clear, concise, and accessible to a well-read audience without sacrificing academic rigor. Complex concepts should be explained simply.
Content Structure
To ensure consistency and readability, all long-form articles must follow a specific structure.
- Title: Clear, descriptive, and neutral.
- Subtitle (Optional): Provides additional context.
- Introduction: Briefly introduces the topic, states the scope of the article, and outlines the key points to be discussed.
- Body: The core of the article, presenting evidence, analysis, and historical context in a logical progression. Paragraphs should be well-organized and focus on a single idea.
- Neutral Conclusion: Summarizes the key findings and evidence presented in the article without introducing new opinions or making prescriptive statements. It should reflect on the topic's historical significance.
Typical article length should be between 700 and 1,100 words.
Sourcing and Accuracy
All factual claims, figures, and direct quotations must be attributable to a reliable primary or secondary source. While we do not use inline citations in the final published text for readability, all sources must be documented internally and available for editorial review. Accuracy is paramount.
Forbidden Words and Phrases
To maintain our analytical focus and avoid a promotional or sensationalist tone, the following words and phrases are strictly forbidden in all content. This list is not exhaustive and is meant to be illustrative of a broader principle.
Commercial and Financial Language
This category is forbidden to prevent our historical analysis from being misconstrued as financial advice or promotion. We analyze business models, but do not use language that encourages personal financial speculation.
- money, profit, revenue, gains
- investment, investor, return on investment
- make money, bonus, cash, passive income
Promotional and "Call to Action" Language
Our publication is analytical, not promotional. We do not persuade the reader to take any action.
- guaranteed, fast, free, limited offer
- secret revealed, hidden strategy, instant result
- unbelievable discovery, shocking revelation
- click here, act now, sign up now
Unsubstantiated and Sensationalist Claims
Our commitment is to documented history, not speculation or unsupported accusations.
- conspiracy, hidden agenda, falsified data
- unverified scandal, guaranteed success, zero risk
- instant wealth, exaggerated claims
Judgmental and Generalizing Language
We maintain neutrality by avoiding moral judgments and generalizations.
- defamatory statements
- moral glorification without historical evidence
- negative generalizations targeting social groups or historical actors
Adherence to these guidelines is the bedrock of our credibility. We believe this disciplined approach is the only way to responsibly explore the complex and impactful history of American industrialization. For inquiries about our editorial process, please use our contact page.